4.8 Article

Behavioral Intervention and Decreased Daily Melamine Exposure from Melamine Tableware

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Volume 49, Issue 16, Pages 9964-9970

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.5b01965

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Kaohsiung Medical University [KMU-DT103004]
  2. Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital [KMUH103-3R67, KMUH101-1I04]
  3. Taiwan Ministry of Science and Technology [NSC 101-2314-B-037-037-MY3]
  4. Taiwan's National Health Research Institutes [NHRI-EX104-10209PI]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aims to examine whether behavior intervention can decrease total urinary melamine excretion. A total of 16 healthy subjects were recruited from two university buildings (eight subjects each). By using a stepped-wedge cluster randomized and controlled trial design, we randomly assigned eight subjects from the same building to the serial steps of either control intervention intervention or control control intervention. Each step lasted for 3 days. Subjects in the intervention step carried one bag containing stainless steel tableware as meal boxes and used them for each meal during the trial, whereas those in the control step carried one empty bag. The 24 h urine samples for 9 consecutive days were collected. In the control intervention intervention group, after excluding two subjects with missing data, the median absolute difference of the total 3 day melamine excretion between the seventh to the ninth day and from the first to the third day was 19.9 mu g (a range from -160.6 to -7.2 mu g, p = 0.028, n = 6). The median protection percent of the total 3 day melamine exposure (the amount from the seventh to the ninth day minus the amount from the first to the third day, divided by the amount from the first to the third day) was 68.4%, ranging from 41.8% to 91.8%. Regular use of stainless steel-made meals boxes can mitigate melamine exposure from melamine tableware.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available