4.8 Article

Kinetics of Substrate Biodegradation under the Cumulative Effects of Bioavailability and Self-Inhibition

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Volume 49, Issue 9, Pages 5529-5537

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/es505837v

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Marie Curie Early Stage Research Training (EST) [MC-EST-20984]
  2. Helmholtz Association (GReaT MoDE) [VG-NG-338]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Microbial degradation is an important process in many environments controlling for instance the cycling of nutrients or the biodegradation of contaminants. At high substrate concentrations toxic effects may inhibit the degradation process. Bioavailability limitations of a degradable substrate can therefore either improve the overall dynamics of degradation by softening the contaminant toxicity effects to microorganisms, or slow down the biodegradation by reducing the microbial access to the substrate. Many studies on biodegradation kinetics of a self-inhibitive substrate have mainly focused on physiological responses of the bacteria to substrate concentration levels without considering the substrate bioavailability limitations rising from different geophysical and geochemical dynamics at pore-scale. In this regard, the role of bioavailability effects on the kinetics of self-inhibiting substrates is poorly understood. In this study, we theoretically analyze this role and assess the interactions between self-inhibition and mass transfer-limitations using analytical/numerical solutions, and show the findings practical relevance for a simple model scenario. Although individually self-inhibition and mass-transfer limitations negatively impact biodegradation, their combined effect may enhance biodegradation rates above a concentration threshold. To our knowledge, this is the first theoretical study describing the cumulative effects of the two mechanisms together.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available