4.7 Article

Investigation of the Mechanism of Roof Caving in the Jinchuan Nickel Mine, China

Journal

ROCK MECHANICS AND ROCK ENGINEERING
Volume 51, Issue 4, Pages 1215-1226

Publisher

SPRINGER WIEN
DOI: 10.1007/s00603-017-1374-0

Keywords

Collapse event; Filling method; Fault activation; Numerical model

Funding

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [41372323, 41372325, 41402280]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

On 13 March 2016, a sudden, violent roof caving event with a collapse area of nearly 11,000 m(2) occurred in the Jinchuan Nickel Mine and accompanied by air blasts, loud noises and ground vibrations. This collapse event coincided with related, conspicuous surface subsidence across an area of nearly 19,000 m(2). This article aims to analyse this collapse event. In previous studies, various mining-induced collapses have been studied, but collapse accidents associated with the filling mining method are very rare and have not been thoroughly studied. The filling method has been regarded as a safe mining method for a long time, so research on associated collapse mechanisms is of considerable significance. In this study, a detailed field investigation of roadway damage was performed, and GPS monitoring results were used to analyse the surface failure. In addition, a numerical model was constructed based on the geometry of the ore body and a major fault. The analysis of the model revealed three failure mechanisms acting during different stages of destruction: double-sided embedded beam deformation, fault activation, and cantilever-articulated rock beam failure. The fault activation and the specific filling method are the key factors of this collapse event. To gain a better understanding of these factors, the shear stress and normal stress along the fault plane were monitored to determine the variation in stress at different failure stages. Discrete element models were established to study two filling methods and to analyse the stability of different filling structures.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available