4.7 Article

Multisensory fusion based virtual tool wear sensing for ubiquitous manufacturing

Journal

ROBOTICS AND COMPUTER-INTEGRATED MANUFACTURING
Volume 45, Issue -, Pages 47-58

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.rcim.2016.05.010

Keywords

Tool wear estimation; Virtual sensing; Feature fusion

Funding

  1. National Science foundation of China [51504274]
  2. Science Foundation of China University of Petroleum, Beijing [2462014YJRC039, 2462015YQ0403]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Pervasiveness of ubiquitous computing advances the manufacturing scheme into a ubiquitous manufacturing era which poses significant challenges on sensing technology and system reliability. To improve manufacturing system reliability, this paper presents a new virtual tool wear sensing technique based on multisensory data fusion and artificial intelligence model for tool condition monitoring. It infers the difficult-to-measure tool wear parameters (e.g. tool wear width) by fusing in-process multisensory data (e.g. force, vibration, etc.) with dimension reduction technique and support vector regression model. Different state-of-the-art dimension reduction techniques including kernel principal component analysis, locally linear embedding, isometric feature mapping, and minimum redundancy maximum relevant method have been investigated for feature fusion in a virtual sensing model, and the kernel principal component analysis performs best in terms of sensing accuracy. The effectiveness of the developed virtual tool wear sensing technique is experimentally validated in a set of machining tool run-to-failure tests on a computer numerical control milling machine. The results show that the estimated tool wear width through virtual sensing is comparable to that measured offline by a microscope instrument in terms of accuracy, moreover, in a more cost-effective manner. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available