4.7 Article

ImmunoScore Signature A Prognostic and Predictive Tool in Gastric Cancer

Journal

ANNALS OF SURGERY
Volume 267, Issue 3, Pages 504-513

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002116

Keywords

adjuvant chemotherapy; gastric cancer; ImmunoScore; prognosis

Categories

Funding

  1. State Key Projects on Infection Diseases of China (the 12th 5-Year Plan Period) [2012ZX10002017-005, 2012ZX10002016-011, 2012ZX10002010-001-007]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81600510, 81672446, 81372243, 81370575, 81370555]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province [S20120011190]
  4. Key Scientific and Technological Projects of Guangdong Province [2014B020228003, 2014B030301041]
  5. Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangzhou [201400000001-3, 158100076]
  6. Public welfare in Health Industry, National Health and Family Planning Commission of China [201402015, 201502039]
  7. Key Clinical Specialty Discipline Construction Program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: We postulated that the ImmunoScore (IS) could markedly improve the prediction of postsurgical survival and chemotherapeutic benefits in gastric cancer (GC). Summary Background Data: A prediction model for GC patients was developed using data from 879 consecutive patients. Methods: The expression of 27 immune features was detected in 251 specimens by using immunohistochemistry, and a 5-feature-based ISGC was then constructed using the LASSO Cox regression model. Testing and validation cohorts were included to validate the model. Results: Using the LASSO model, we established an ISGC classifier based on 5 features: CD3(invasive margin) (IM), CD3(center) (of tumor) (CT), CD8(IM), CD45RO(CT), and CD66b(IM). Significant differences were found between the high-ISGC and low-ISGC patients in the training cohort in 5-year disease-free survival (45.0% vs. 4.4%, respectively; P < 0.001) and 5-year overall survival (48.8% vs. 6.7%, respectively; P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed that the ISGC classifier was an independent prognostic factor. A combination of ISGC and tumor, node, and metastasis (TNM) had better prognostic value than TNM stage alone. Further analysis revealed that stage II and III GC patients with high-ISGC exhibited a favorable response to adjuvant chemotherapy. Finally, we constructed 2 nomograms to predict which patients with stages II and III GC might benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy after surgery. Conclusions: The ISGC classifier could effectively predict recurrence and survival of GC, and complemented the prognostic value of the TNM staging system. Moreover, the ISGC might be a useful predictive tool to identify stage II and III GC patients who would benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available