4.8 Article

Viruses at Solid Water Interfaces: A Systematic Assessment of Interactions Driving Adsorption

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Volume 50, Issue 2, Pages 732-743

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.5b04644

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation, SINERGIA [CRSI22_127568]
  2. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [CRSI22_127568] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Adsorption to solid-water interfaces is a major process governing the fate of waterborne viruses in natural and engineered systems. The relative contributions of different interaction forces to adsorption and their dependence on the physicochemical properties of the viruses remain, however, only poorly understood. Herein, we systematically studied the adsorption of four bacteriophages (MS2, fr, GA, and Q beta) to five model surfaces with varying surface chemistries and to three dissolved organic matter adlayers, as a function of solution pH and ionic strength, using quartz crystal microbalance with dissipation monitoring. The viruses were selected to have similar sizes and shapes but different surface charges, polarities, and topographies, as identified by modeling the distributions of amino acids in the virus capsids. Virus-sorbent interactions were governed by long-ranged electrostatics and favorable contributions from the hydrophobic effect, and shorter-ranged van der Waals interactions were of secondary importance. Steric effects depended on the topographic irregularities on both the virus and sorbent surfaces. Differences in the adsorption characteristics of the tested viruses were successfully linked to differences in their capsid surface properties. Besides identifying the major interaction forces, this work highlights the potential of computable virus surface charge and polarity descriptors to predict virus adsorption to solid-water interfaces.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available