4.6 Article

Differentially Private Distributed Convex Optimization via Functional Perturbation

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CONTROL OF NETWORK SYSTEMS
Volume 5, Issue 1, Pages 395-408

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TCNS.2016.2614100

Keywords

Cyber-physical systems; differential privacy; distributed algorithms/control; networks of autonomous agents; optimization

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation (NSF) [CNS-1329619, FA9550-15-1-0108]
  2. Division Of Computer and Network Systems
  3. Direct For Computer & Info Scie & Enginr [1329619, GRANTS:13736488] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We study a class of distributed convex constrained optimization problems where a group of agents aim to minimize the sum of individual objective functions while each desires that any information about its objective function is kept private. We prove the impossibility of achieving differential privacy using strategies based on perturbing the inter-agent messages with noise when the underlying noise-free dynamics are asymptotically stable. This justifies our algorithmic solution based on the perturbation of individual functions with Laplace noise. To this end, we establish a general framework for differentially private handling of functional data. We further design post-processing steps that ensure the perturbed functions regain the smoothness and convexity properties of the original functions while preserving the differentially private guarantees of the functional perturbation step. This methodology allows us to use any distributed coordination algorithm to solve the optimization problem on the noisy functions. Finally, we explicitly bound the magnitude of the expected distance between the perturbed and true optimizers which leads to an upper bound on the privacy-accuracy tradeoff curve. Simulations illustrate our results.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available