4.7 Article

Strong Evidence against a Non-degenerate Companion in SN 2012cg

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 855, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/aaa1e9

Keywords

supernovae: individual (SN 2012cg)

Funding

  1. NASA - Space Telescope Science Institute [HF-51348]
  2. NASA [NAS 5-26555]
  3. NSF [AST-1515876, AST-1515927, AST-9987045]
  4. James Arthur Fellowship at NYU
  5. Research Corporation for Science Advancement
  6. NSF Telescope System Instrumentation Program
  7. Ohio Board of Regents
  8. Ohio State University Office of Research
  9. Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
  10. National Science Foundation
  11. U.S. Department of Energy
  12. National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  13. Japanese Monbukagakusho
  14. Max Planck Society
  15. Higher Education Funding Council for England

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Even though SN 2012cg is one of the best-studied Type Ia supernovae to date, the nature of its progenitor system has been debated in numerous studies. Specifically, it is difficult to reconcile recent claims of the detection of a similar to 6 M-circle dot MS companion with recent deep, late-time H alpha flux limits. In this study we add three new constraints. (1) We analyze a new high-signal-to-noise, nebular-phase, Large Binocular Telescope/MODS spectrum of SN 2012cg and place an upper limit on the amount of low-velocity, solar-abundance material removed from a possible companion of <7.8 x 10(-3) M-circle dot. (2) We use Swift X-ray observations to constrain the pre-explosion mass-loss rate to be M (over dot) < 10(-6) M-circle dot yr(-1) for nu(w) = 100 km s(-1). (3) We carefully reanalyze a prediscovery MASTER image, and with published light curves of SN 2012cg we estimate the time of first light and conservatively constrain the radius of a Roche-lobe overflowing companion to be <0.24 R-circle dot. These observations disagree with a large nearby companion, and when considered with other studies of SN 2012cg's progenitor system, essentially rule out a non-degenerate companion.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available