Journal
BJU INTERNATIONAL
Volume 121, Issue 3, Pages 437-444Publisher
WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/bju.14044
Keywords
cost analysis; health economics; robotic cystectomy
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Objectives To perform a cost analysis comparing the cost of robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) with open RC (ORC) in a UK tertiary referral centre and to identify the key cost drivers. Patients and Methods Data on hospital length of stay (LOS), operative time (OT), transfusion rate, and volume and complication rate were obtained from a prospectively updated institutional database for patients undergoing RARC or ORC. A cost decision tree model was created. Sensitivity analysis was performed to find key drivers of overall cost and to find breakeven points with ORC. Monte Carlo analysis was performed to quantify the variability in the dataset. Results One RARC procedure costs 12 pound 449.87, or 12 pound 106.12 if the robot was donated via charitable funds. In comparison, one ORC procedure costs 10 pound 474.54. RARC is 18.9% more expensive than ORC. The key cost drivers were OT, LOS, and the number of cases performed per annum. Conclusion High ongoing equipment costs remain a large barrier to the cost of RARC falling. However, minimal improvements in patient quality of life would be required to offset this difference.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available