4.7 Article

Does satisfactory neighbourhood environment lead to a satisfying life? An investigation of the association between neighbourhood environment and life satisfaction in Beijing

Journal

CITIES
Volume 74, Issue -, Pages 229-239

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cities.2017.12.008

Keywords

Neighbourhood satisfaction; Subjective wellbeing; Relative income; Multilevel modelling; China

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41601148, 41671166, 41529101]
  2. Economic and Social Research Council [ES/N007603/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. ESRC [ES/N007603/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Associated with the dramatic expansion of Chinese cities are the unprecedented scale and pace of changes to urban living environment. There is an imperative to assess residents' perceptions of neighbourhood environment and the impacts on life satisfaction. Drawing on a large-scale residential satisfaction survey conducted in Beijing in 2013, we examine the fine-grained spatial distribution and determinants of residents' life satisfaction. A multilevel ordinal response model is employed to investigate the roles of neighbourhood satisfaction, perceived relative income, socio-demographic characteristics, and contextual factors in predicting life satisfaction. Results show that satisfaction with key neighbourhood characteristics including safety, physical and social environments, and travel convenience is statistically significantly associated with life satisfaction. Income relative to that of peers in local areas or to that in the past is a more important predictor of life satisfaction than absolute income. Other individual-level variables, such as age, family structure, hukou status, health, commuting time, and housing-related variables including housing tenure and floor space, are significant correlates of life satisfaction.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available