4.7 Article

Modified climate with long term memory in tree ring proxies

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS
Volume 10, Issue 8, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/10/8/084020

Keywords

climate reconstructions; tree-ring width; maximum latewood density; frequency domains

Funding

  1. US National Science Foundation
  2. Swiss National Science Foundation
  3. US National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration
  4. International Geosphere-Biosphere Programme
  5. Centre of Climate Dynamics (SKD), Bergen
  6. Czech project 'Building up a multidisciplinary scientific team focused on drought' [CZ.1.07/2.3.00/20.0248]
  7. Division Of Earth Sciences
  8. Directorate For Geosciences [1440015] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Long term memory (LTM) scaling behavior in worldwide tree-ring proxies and subsequent climate reconstructions is analyzed for and compared with the memory structure inherent to instrumental temperature and precipitation data. Detrended fluctuation analysis is employed to detect LTM, and its scaling exponent a is used to evaluate LTM. The results show that temperature and precipitation reconstructions based on ring width measurements (mean alpha = 0.8) contain more memory than records based on maximum latewood density (mean alpha = 0.7). Both exceed the memory inherent to regional instrumental data (alpha = 0.6 for temperature, alpha = 0.5 for precipitation) in the time scales ranging from 1 year up to 50 years. We compare memory-free (alpha = 0.5) pseudo-instrumental precipitation data with pseudo-reconstructed precipitation data with LTM (alpha > 0.5), and demonstrate the biasing influences of LTM on climate reconstructions. We call for attention to statistical analysis with regard to the variability of proxy-based chronologies or reconstructions, particularly with respect to the contained (i) trends, (ii) past warm/cold period and wet/dry periods; and (iii) extreme events.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available