4.4 Article

The cGAS/STING Pathway Detects Streptococcus pneumoniae but Appears Dispensable for Antipneumococcal Defense in Mice and Humans

Journal

INFECTION AND IMMUNITY
Volume 86, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/IAI.00849-17

Keywords

innate immunity; cGAS; STING; Streptococcus pneumoniae; pneumonia; type I interferons; single-nucleotide polymorphism; human

Funding

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [GRK1673/B5, GRK1673/A5, SFB/TR84]
  2. German Ministry for Education and Research (CAPSyS)
  3. Ministry of Science and Higher Education (MEIN), Poland [PBZ-MEiN-9/2/2006-K143/P01/2007/1]
  4. National Institutes of Health [R21AI099346, T32AI022295]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Streptococcus pneumoniae is a frequent colonizer of the upper respiratory tract and a leading cause of bacterial pneumonia. The innate immune system senses pneumococcal cell wall components, toxin, and nucleic acids, which leads to production of inflammatory mediators to initiate and control antibacterial defense. Here, we show that the cGAS (cyclic GMP-AMP [cGAMP] synthase)-STING pathway mediates detection of pneumococcal DNA in mouse macrophages to primarily stimulate type I interferon (IFN) responses. Cells of human individuals carrying HAQ TMEM173, which encodes a common hypomorphic variant of STING, were largely or partly defective in inducing type I IFNs and proinflammatory cytokines upon infection. Subsequent analyses, however, revealed that STING was dispensable for restricting S. pneumoniae during acute pneumonia in mice. Moreover, explorative analyses did not find differences in the allele frequency of HAQ TMEM173 in nonvaccinated pneumococcal pneumonia patients and healthy controls or an association of HAQ TMEM173 carriage with disease severity. Together, our results indicate that the cGAS/STING pathway senses S. pneumoniae but plays no major role in antipneumococcal immunity in mice and humans.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available