3.8 Article

Ticagrelor for Neuroendovascular Procedures: A Case Series

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHARMACY PRACTICE
Volume 31, Issue 1, Pages 115-119

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/0897190017696947

Keywords

anticoagulation; neurology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: The development of thromboembolism is one of the most common complications of neuroendovascular procedures. Although several small studies have deemed clopidogrel safe and effective in the prevention of intracranial stent thrombosis, ticagrelor has yet to be assessed in this setting. Objective: The objective of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the safety and efficacy of ticagrelor in patients undergoing neuroendovascular procedures. Methods: A retrospective review of patients receiving ticagrelor following neuroendovascular aneurysm repair. Results: A total of 5 patients undergoing neuroendovascular aneurysm repair received ticagrelor for a median of 5 days while hospitalized. Three patients were treated with stent-assisted coiling, while 2 received pipeline embolization devices. All patients received additional low-dose aspirin therapy. One patient received ticagrelor after experiencing a thrombotic event on clopidogrel, while a second patient was treated with ticagrelor after developing a dermatologic reaction to clopidogrel. Three (60%) patients were successfully treated and discharged on ticagrelor therapy. Two patients experienced cerebrovascular accidents following aneurysm repair while receiving ticagrelor, one of which was potentially due to medication omission. One (20%) patient receiving ticagrelor experienced a small retroperitoneal hematoma; however, ticagrelor therapy was continued without further complication. Conclusion: Therapy with ticagrelor may be a safe and effective treatment option for patients undergoing neuroendovascular aneurysm repair. However, future studies are warranted to substantiate these findings.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available