4.7 Article

Beta-cell sensitivity to glucose is impaired after gastric bypass surgery

Journal

DIABETES OBESITY & METABOLISM
Volume 20, Issue 4, Pages 872-878

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/dom.13165

Keywords

beta-cell glucose sensitivity; gastric bypass surgery; glucose tolerance

Funding

  1. National Institute of Health [DK105379, DK083554, D. K.101991]
  2. National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institute of Health [8 UL1 TR000077]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aims: Patients who have undergone Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery (GB) have exaggerated postprandial insulin secretion, which has been attributed to increased meal glucose appearance and enhanced incretin effect. Here, we sought to determine beta-cell glucose sensitivity in the absence of meal stimulation and insulinotropic gut factors. Materials and methods: A total of 12 non-diabetic subjects with prior GB, and 7 matched non-surgical control subjects with normal glucose tolerance were studied. Blood glucose and insulin secretion rates were measured during a graded glucose infusion at increasing and then decreasing rates. Insulin sensitivity (S-I) and glucose effectiveness (S-G) were determined by the minimal model. Results: GB subjects had S-I comparable to that of control subjects. GB subjects had relative hyperglycaemia during the highest dose of glucose infusion associated with significantly reduced beta-cell glucose sensitivity throughout both step-up (GB: 34 6, CN: 82 +/- 9 pmolmin(-1) mM(-1) L, P < .0001) and step-down (GB: 31 +/- 6, CN: 74 +/- 9 pmol min(-1) mM(-1) L, P < .0001) phases of the glucose infusion. GB subjects also had reduced S-G (GB: 0.04 +/- 0.00, CN: 0.07 +/- 0.01min(-1), P=.004). Conclusion: In the absence of enteric stimuli, beta-cell sensitivity to changes in g(l)ycaemia is blunted among individuals with GB, indicating a significant shift in a fundamental property of beta-cell function several years after surgery

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available