4.2 Article

Drug-related stigma and access to care among people who inject drugs in Vietnam

Journal

DRUG AND ALCOHOL REVIEW
Volume 37, Issue 3, Pages 333-339

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/dar.12589

Keywords

drug use; stigma; access to care; Vietnam

Funding

  1. National Institute on Drug Abuse/NIH [R01DA033609]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction and AimsThere are considerable challenges faced by people with a history of injecting drug use (PWID) in Vietnam, including drug-related stigma and lack of access to healthcare. Seeking and utilising healthcare, as well as harm reduction programs for PWID, are often hampered by drug-related stigma. This study aimed to examine the impacts of drug-related stigma on access to care and utilisation of harm reduction programs among PWID in Vietnam. Design and MethodsA cross-sectional study was conducted in two provinces in Vietnam, Phu ThO and Vinh Phuc. The study participants completed the survey by using Audio Computer-Assisted Self-Interview between late 2014 and early 2015. Linear multiple regression models and logistic regression models were used to assess the relationship among drug-related stigma, access to care and utilisation of harm reduction programs, including methadone maintenance treatment (MMT) and needle exchange programs (NEP). ResultsA total of 900 PWID participated in this study. Drug-related stigma was significantly associated with lower level of access to care, but not with utilisation of MMT or NEP. Older age was positively associated with higher levels of access to care. Levels of education were positively correlated with access to care, as well as utilisation of MMT and NEP. Discussion and ConclusionsThis study underscores the need for future interventions to reduce drug-related stigma in society and in health-care settings to improve PWID's utilisation of care services. Special attention should be paid to younger PWID and those with lower levels of education.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available