4.5 Review

Monitoring biological wastewater treatment processes: recent advances in spectroscopy applications

Journal

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11157-017-9439-9

Keywords

Wastewater treatment; Ultraviolet-visible spectroscopy; Infrared spectroscopy; Fluorescence spectroscopy

Funding

  1. Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT) [UID/BIO/04469/2013, POCI-01-0145-FEDER-006684, RECI/BBB-EBI/0179/2012 (FCOMP-01-0124-FEDER-027462)]
  2. European Regional Development Fund under the scope of Norte-Programa Operacional Regional do Norte [NORTE-01-0145-FEDER-000004]
  3. FCT-Portugal [SFRH/BPD/82558/2011, SFRH/BPD/101338/2014]
  4. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [RECI/BBB-EBI/0179/2012, UID/BIO/04469/2013] Funding Source: FCT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Biological processes based on aerobic and anaerobic technologies have been continuously developed to wastewater treatment and are currently routinely employed to reduce the contaminants discharge levels in the environment. However, most methodologies commonly applied for monitoring key parameters are labor intensive, time-consuming and just provide a snapshot of the process. Thus, spectroscopy applications in biological processes are, nowadays, considered a rapid and effective alternative technology for real-time monitoring though still lacking implementation in full-scale plants. In this review, the application of spectroscopic techniques to aerobic and anaerobic systems is addressed focusing on UV-Vis, infrared, and fluorescence spectroscopy. Furthermore, chemometric techniques, valuable tools to extract the relevant data, are also referred. To that effect, a detailed analysis is performed for aerobic and anaerobic systems to summarize the findings that have been obtained since 2000. Future prospects for the application of spectroscopic techniques in biological wastewater treatment processes are further discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available