4.4 Article

The Efficacy and Safety of Early Postoperative Botulinum Toxin A Injection for Facial Scars

Journal

AESTHETIC PLASTIC SURGERY
Volume 42, Issue 2, Pages 530-537

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00266-017-1008-7

Keywords

Botulinum toxin A; Facial scarring; Scar hyperpigmentation; Wound healing; Scar maturation

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Scars widen when the underlying musculature pulls apart suture lines, and scars oriented against relaxed skin tension lines are especially susceptible to these distraction forces. Because botulinum toxin A (BTA) induces complete muscle paralysis, the purpose of the current study was to evaluate the effects of BTA using both observer-dependent qualitative assessments and quantitative measurements to verify its beneficial effects on facial scarring. Patients with vertical forehead lacerations, treated by primary closure, were randomly assigned to two groups: one (n = 15) received BTA injections within 5 days of primary closure and the other (n = 15) received no further treatment. Vancouver scar scale (VSS) scores and wound width were determined at the 1-month and 6-month follow-up visits. Quantitative color differences between the scar and surrounding normal skin, using the Commission International d'Eclairage L*a*b* color coordinates, were measured and compared by analyzing photographs. Improved VSS scores, less increase in wound width, and less scar discoloration were noted among patients treated with BTA injections compared with the control group. These differences were observed at the 6-month visit, but not at the 1-month visit. BTA injection improves scar quality when injected during the early postoperative days. This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors http://www.springer.com/00266.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available