4.5 Article

New photoplethysmogram indicators for improving cuffless and continuous blood pressure estimation accuracy

Journal

PHYSIOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT
Volume 39, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6579/aaa454

Keywords

blood pressure; continuous and cuffless estimation; photoplethysmogram indicators; pulse transit time

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [91420301, 81572233]
  2. Shenzhen High-level Oversea Talent Program (Shenzhen Peacock Plan) Grant [KQCX2015033117354152]
  3. Shenzhen Basic Research Grant [JCYJ20150401150223634]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: The accuracy of cuffless and continuous blood pressure (BP) estimation has been improved, but it is still unsatisfactory for clinical uses. This study was designed to further increase BP estimation accuracy. Approach: In this study, a number of new indicators were extracted from photoplethysmogram (PPG) recordings and a linear regression method was used to construct BP estimation models based on the PPG indicators and pulse transit time (PTT). The performance of the BP estimation models was evaluated by the PPG recordings from 22 subjects when they performed mental arithmetic stress and Valsalva's manoeuvre tasks that could induce BP fluctuations. Main results: Our results showed that the best PPG-based BP estimation model could achieve a decrease of 0.31 +/- 0.08 mmHg in systolic BP (SBP) and 0.33 +/- 0.01 mmHg in diastolic BP (DBP) on estimation errors of grand absolute mean (GAM) and standard deviation (GSD) in comparison to the previously reported PPG-based methods. The best estimation model based on the combination of PPG and PPT could achieve a decrease (GAM & GSD) of 0.81 +/- 0.95 mmHg in SBP and 0.75 +/- 0.54 mmHg in DBP in comparison to the PPT-based methods. Significance: The findings suggest that the newly proposed PPG indicators would be promising for improving the accuracy of continuous and cuffless BP estimation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available