4.4 Article

Effects of Ai Chi on balance, quality of life, functional mobility, and motor impairment in patients with Parkinson's disease

Journal

DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION
Volume 40, Issue 7, Pages 791-797

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2016.1276972

Keywords

Ai Chi; balance; functional mobility; motor impairment; quality of life; Parkinson's disease

Categories

Funding

  1. Ahi Evran University Medical Faculty Educational and Research Hospital

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: In this study, we aimed to investigate effects of Ai Chi on balance, functional mobility, health-related quality of life, and motor impairment in patients with Parkinson's disease. Method: This study was conducted as an open-label randomized controlled trial (ISRCTN26292510) with repeated measures. Forty patients with Parkinson's disease stages 2 to 3 according to the Hoehn and Yahr Scale were randomly allocated to either an Ai Chi exercise group or a land-based exercise control group for 5 weeks. Balance was measured using the Biodex-3,1 and the Berg Balance Scale. Functional mobility was evaluated using the Timed Up and Go Test. Additionally, health-related quality of life and motor activity were assessed with the Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire-39 and the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale-III. Results: Although patients in both groups showed significant improvement in all outcome variables, improvement of dynamic balance was significantly greater in the Ai Chi group (p<0.001), Berg Balance Scale ( p<0.001), Timed Up and Go Test (p = 0.002), Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire-39 (p< 0.001), Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale-III ( p< 0.001). Conclusion: Our results suggest that an Ai Chi exercise program improves balance, mobility, motor ability, and quality of life. In addition, Ai Chi exercise was more effective as an intervention than land-based exercise in patients with mild to moderate Parkinson's disease.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available