4.4 Article

Small mammal abundance and seed predation across boundaries in a restored-grazed woodland interface

Journal

RESTORATION ECOLOGY
Volume 26, Issue 4, Pages 787-795

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/rec.12600

Keywords

grazing; passive restoration; Prosopis flexuosa; rodents; woodland

Categories

Funding

  1. Agencia Nacional de Promocion Cientifica y Tecnologica
  2. CONICET [PICT 0185, PIP 2012-2014/112 201101 00601, PIP 2013-2015/112 201201 00270]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Passive restoration is an effective tool for the maintenance and conservation of biodiversity. Often areas in recovery are immersed in a matrix of land uses, in which the expansion and intensification of human activities exert new visible pressures at their boundaries. The degree of connectivity between these areas and their peripheral lands can be analyzed by mobile link species, organisms that actively move in the landscape by connecting areas to one another through their functional roles. We focus our design on the interface generated by the long-term restoration area and surrounding grazing lands. We analyze the changes on boundary structure, small mammal abundance, and on the function of native seed dispersal by these vertebrate species. We captured small mammals and determined seed removal of Prosopis flexuosa at three distances inside and outside a fence that delineates passively restored and currently grazed areas. Our results indicate that small rodents find more suitable habitats at the site under restoration than in grazing lands. The restored-grazing interface shows a decrease in small mammal abundance from the protected area to the grazed lands. From a functional perspective, an increase in small mammal abundance results in an increase in their seed removal activity with implications for seed fate, because the long-term recovery of vegetation could enhance seed predation on a native tree species.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available