4.7 Article

Biopolymer production and end of life comparisons using life cycle assessment

Journal

RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING
Volume 122, Issue -, Pages 295-306

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.03.002

Keywords

Bioplastic; Waste; LCA; Compost; Recycle; Polylactic acid

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [CBET 1066658/1246547/1553126]
  2. Environmental Research and Education Foundation
  3. Directorate For Engineering
  4. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys [1553126] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper presents an attributional life cycle assessment of biopolymers and traditional plastics using real world disposal methods based on collected data and existing inventories. The focus of this LCA is to investigate actual disposal methods for the end of life phase of biopolymers and traditional fossil-based plastics relative to their corresponding production impacts. This paper connects commonly available methods of disposal for traditional fossil-based plastics and the compostability of polylactic acid and thermoplastic starch to compare these materials not just based on production impacts but also on various scenarios for recycling, composting, and landfilling. Additionally, three traditional resins were evaluated (PET, HDPE, and LDPE) using fossil and bio-based production pathways to assess the performance of bio-based products in the recycling stream. The results demonstrate real environmental tradeoffs associated with agricultural production of plastics and the consequential changes resulting from shifting from recyclable to compostable products. The potential for methane production in landfills is a significant factor for global warming impacts associated with biopolymers while recycling provides major benefits in the global warming and fossil fuel depletion categories. A sensitivity analysis was conducted to investigate the relative importance of locale-specific factors such as travel distances and sorting technologies to the end of life treatment methods of recycling, composting, and landfilling. The results show that composting has some advantages, especially when compared to impacts associated with landfilling, but that recycling provides the greatest benefits at end of life. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available