4.6 Article

The 'normal' range of FMR1 triple CGG repeats may be associated with primary ovarian insufficiency in China

Journal

REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE
Volume 34, Issue 2, Pages 175-180

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2016.11.001

Keywords

CGG repeat, primary ovarian insufficiency (POI); fragile X mental retardation 1 (FMR1); occurrence; resumption

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81300456]
  2. Joint Research Fund for Overseas Natural Science of China [31429004]
  3. Research fund of National Health and Family Planning Commission of China [201402004]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between normal Fragile X mental retardation gene 1 (FMR1) CGG repeat numbers and primary ovarian insufficiency (POI) occurrence or subsequent resumption of ovarian function. A total of 122 women with POI and 105 controls were followed up and analysed in our centre. The prevalence of premutation and intermediate range of FMR1 CGG repeats in Han Chinese women with POI was only 0.81% (1/122) and 1.64% (2/122), respectively. The risk of POI occurrence for less than 26 CGG repeats and 29 or more CGG repeats in allele1 (smaller allele) was significantly higher than that for 26-28 CGG repeats (odds ratio 13.50, 95% confidence interval: 3.21 to 56.77 and 6.32, 95% confidence interval: 2.49 to 16.09 respectively; both P < 0.001). No significant difference was found in the CGG repeat distribution (< 26, 26-28, or >= 29) in FMR1 allele1 between POI cases whose ovarian function resumed and those whose ovarian function did not. It is suggested that the CGG repeat number in allele1, but not that in allele2 (longer allele), was significantly associated with POI occurrence (P < 0.001). Fewer than 26 or more than 28 CGG repeats in FMR1 allele1 were both risk factors of POI occurrence. (C) 2016 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available