4.6 Article

Revealing Molecular Electronic Structure via Analysis of Valence Electron Density

Journal

ACTA PHYSICO-CHIMICA SINICA
Volume 34, Issue 5, Pages 503-513

Publisher

PEKING UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201709252

Keywords

Electron density; Wavefunction analysis; Chemical bond; Electron localization Function; Atoms in molecules; Density functional theory; Laplacian of electron density; Deformation density

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Numerous real space functions have been purposed so far for unveiling chemically interesting molecular electronic structure characteristics, such as chemical bonds, lone pairs, and multicenter electronic conjugations. Among these analysis methods, electron localization function (ELF), Laplacian of electron density (del(2)rho), and deformation density (rho(def)) were widely employed in practical research work. It is well known that the analysis of total molecular electron density is not sufficient for revealing much information about the molecular electronic structure like the above-mentioned methods. However, in this work, using several instances and by comparing with the ELF, del(2)rho, and rho(def) values, we show that it is possible to explore molecular electronic structure characteristics if one solely focuses on investigating the valence electron density distribution. It is found that for most cases, analysis of the very simple valence electron density conveys analogous information as ELF, del(2)rho and rho(def) analyses, with additional advantage of reduced computational complexity. We hope that this work will bring chemists' attention to the high importance of valence electron density, which has been largely ignored for a long time. It should also be noticed that the valence electron density analysis is not free from drawbacks, and when this method is unable to provide an informative picture, one has to use other analysis methods.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available