Journal
ENVIRONMENTAL POLITICS
Volume 27, Issue 3, Pages 411-432Publisher
ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/09644016.2018.1444723
Keywords
Carbon dioxide emissions; democracy; corruption; climate change; mitigation
Categories
Funding
- Center for Collective Action Research
- Quality of Government Institute
- Varieties of Democracy Institute at the University of Gothenburg
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Previous research has shown that democracies exhibit stronger commitments to mitigate climate change and, generally, emit less carbon dioxide than non-democratic regimes. However, there remains much unexplained variation in how democratic regimes perform in this regard. Here it is argued that the benefits of democracy for climate change mitigation are limited in the presence of widespread corruption that reduces the capacity of democratic governments to reach climate targets and reduce CO2 emissions. Using a sample of 144 countries over 1970-2011, the previously established relationship between the amount of countries' CO2 emissions and their level of democracy is revisited. It is empirically tested whether this relationship is instead moderated by the levels of corruption. The results indicate that more democracy is only associated with lower CO2 emissions in low-corruption contexts. If corruption is high, democracies do not seem to do better than authoritarian regimes.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available