4.5 Article

Wastewater analysis: the mean of the monitoring of frequently prescribed pharmaceuticals in Slovakia

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT
Volume 188, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10661-015-5011-7

Keywords

Wastewater; LC-MS/MS; Monitoring; Psychoactive pharmaceuticals; Drugs

Funding

  1. Slovak Research and Development Agency [APVV-0122-12]
  2. Slovak National Monitoring Centre [122/2013]
  3. Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic [CZ.1.05/2.1.00/01.0024, LO1205]
  4. Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The estimation of medication use is based on the statistical data from pharmacies and hospitals. Excessive use or misuse of some compounds, especially psychoactive medications, has not yet been monitored in Slovakia. Wastewater analysis provides useful data about the medication use and misuse in individual regions. This study is focused on the analysis of 23 substances in the wastewaters of Slovakia. The monitoring programme has included stimulants, opioid and morphine derivatives, benzodiazepines, antidepressants, drug precursors and their metabolites. Urinary markers of these compounds were analysed atWWTP influent in seven regions (Bratislava, Kosice, Zvolen, Banska Bystrica, Trencin, Presov a Piest'any) using LC-MS/MS technique. The analysis was performed from March to October 2013. The pattern in use of these compounds was also monitored. Tramadol and venlafaxine were found to be the most concentrated compounds among of all studied psychoactive pharmaceuticals. The highest specific loads of tramadol were detected in Piestany (409 mg/day/1000 inhabitants) and Zvolen (366 mg/day/1000 inhabitants). There is a considerable number of spa facilities (hotels) situated in these cities and this fact contributes to a higher occurrence of these psychoactive compounds in respective wastewaters.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available