4.7 Article

Automatic tree species recognition with quantitative structure models

Journal

REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT
Volume 191, Issue -, Pages 1-12

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2016.12.002

Keywords

Tree species recognition; Terrestrial laser scanning; Quantitative structure model; Tree reconstruction

Funding

  1. Academy of Finland research projects Centre of Excellence [284715]
  2. Challenges of forest management in the changing environment [292930]
  3. Resource utilization pattern of wood-inhabiting fungi [292899]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present three robust methods to accurately and automatically recognize tree species from terrestrial laser scanner data. The recognition is based on the use of quantitative structure tree models, which are hierarchical geometric primitive models accurately approximating the branching structure, geometry, and volume of the trees. Fifteen robust tree features are presented and tested with all different combinations for tree species classification. The classification methods presented are k-nearest neighbours, multinomial regression, and support vector machine based approaches. Three mainly single-species forest plots of Silver birch, Scots pine and Norway spruce, and two mixed-species forest plots located in Finland and a total number of trees over 1200 were used for demonstration. The results show that by using single species forest plots for training and testing, it is possible to find a feature combination between 5 and 15 features, that results in an average classification accuracy above 93% for all the methods. For the preliminary mixed-species forest plot testing, accuracy was lower but the classification approach presented potential to generalize to more diverse cases. Moreover, the results show that the post-processing of terrestrial laser scanning data of multi-hectare forest, from tree extraction and modelling to species classification, can be done automatically. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available