4.7 Article

A snow-free vegetation index for improved monitoring of vegetation spring green-up date in deciduous ecosystems

Journal

REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT
Volume 196, Issue -, Pages 1-12

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2017.04.031

Keywords

Vegetation phenology; Green-up date; Remote sensing; Snowmelt; NDPI; Climate change

Funding

  1. Fund for Creative Research Groups of National Natural Science Foundation of China [41321001]
  2. Northeastern States Research Cooperative, NSF's Macrosystems Biology Program [EF-1065029]
  3. DOE's Regional and Global Climate Modeling Program [DE-SC0016011]
  4. US National Park Service Inventory and Monitoring Program
  5. USA National Phenology Network (United States Geological Survey) [G10AP00129]
  6. project of Early detection and prediction of climate warming based on the long-term monitoring of fragile ecosystems in the East Asia - Ministry of Environment, Japan [MOJ-Kan-1351]
  7. U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Science

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Vegetative spring green-up date (GUD), an indicator of plants' sensitivity to climate change, exerts an important influence on biogeochemical cycles. Conventionally, large-scale monitoring of spring phenology is primarily detected by satellite-based vegetation indices (VIs), e.g. the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI). However, these indices have long been criticized, as the derived GUD can be biased by snowmelt. To minimize the snowmelt effect in monitoring spring phenology, we developed a new index, Normalized Difference Phenology Index (NDPI), which is a 3-band VI, designed to best contrast vegetation from the background (i.e. soil and snow in this study) as well as to minimize the difference among the backgrounds. We examined the rigorousness of NDPI in three ways. First, we conducted mathematical simulations to show that NDPI is mathematically robust and performs superior to NDVI for differentiating vegetation from the background, theoretically justifying NDPI for spring phenology monitoring. Second, we applied NDPI using MODIS land surface reflectance products to real vegetative ecosystems of three in-situ PhenoCam sites. Our results show that, despite large snow cover in the winter and snowmelt process in the spring, the temporal trajectories of NDPI closely track the vegetation green-up events. Finally, we applied NDPI to 11 eddy-covariance tower sites, spanning large gradients in latitude and vegetation types in deciduous ecosystems, using the same MODIS products. Our results suggest that the GUD derived by using NDPI is consistent with daily gross primary production (GPP) derived GUD, with R (Spearman's correlation) = 0.93, Bias = 2.90 days, and RMSE (the root mean square error) = 7.75 days, which outcompetes the snow removed NDVI approach, with R = 0.90, Bias = 7.34 days, and RMSE = 10.91 days. We concluded that our newly-developed NDPI is robust to snowmelt effect and is a reliable approach for monitoring spring green-up in deciduous ecosystems. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available