4.2 Article

Using Trampling Modification to Infer Occupational Intensity During the Still Bay at Blombos Cave, Southern Cape, South Africa

Journal

AFRICAN ARCHAEOLOGICAL REVIEW
Volume 35, Issue 1, Pages 1-19

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10437-018-9286-2

Keywords

Middle Stone Age; Still Bay; Blombos Cave; Trampling; Taphonomy; Occupational intensity

Funding

  1. South African National Research Foundation (NRF) [107082]
  2. Palaeontological Scientific Trust (PAST)
  3. Faculty Research Committee (FRC) Grant
  4. Diversifying the Academy from the University of the Witwatersrand
  5. NRF/Department of Science and Technology
  6. CSH's SARChI Chair
  7. Research Council of Norway through its Centre's of Excellence funding scheme
  8. Centre for Early Sapiens Behaviour (SapienCE) [262618]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Demography probably had a significant influence on the transmission of cultural innovation during the late Pleistocene. In enclosed sites such as rockshelters, trampling marks are likely direct evidence for human occupations and can possibly be used to infer occupational patterns. In this study, we explore trampling modification as a proxy for occupational intensity. We examined trampling data at the Middle Stone Age site of Blombos Cave in South Africa to investigate whether these marks may inform on occupational intensity during the Still Bay period-a significant era for the development of behavioural modernity. Trampling is defined by pitting, scratches, abrasion and linear marks. These marks were then compared to other taphonomic proxies (e.g., faunal density per volume, transverse fractures, non-anthropogenic modification) to explore the relationships between these indicators. Our results indicate that trampling modifications can provide information on a site's occupational history and that the data indicate that there are two phases within the Blombos sequence showing more intense/frequency occupations, corresponding to the early and middle Still Bay deposits.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available