4.7 Article

Hybrid Hidden Markov Models for resilience metrics in a dynamic infrastructure system

Journal

RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY
Volume 164, Issue -, Pages 84-97

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2017.02.009

Keywords

Resilience; Infrastructure system; Time-varying capacity; Hidden Markov Model; Uncertainty

Funding

  1. Research Foundation of China [71673188]
  2. National Research Foundation, Prime Minister's Office, Singapore under its Campus for Research Excellence and Technological Enterprise (CREATE) programme

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Disruptive events triggered by natural disasters, man-made accidents, or violent attacks can lead to significant consequences and losses for networked infrastructure systems. A critical consideration for a disrupted system is enhancing its resilience to rapidly recover to the desired performance level. The nature of the resilience measurement problem can be summarized as the following: (I) system capacities are dependent/interdependent and time-varying; (2) the severity of consequences and potential losses caused by disruptions are associated with uncertainties; (3) system performances depend on resources input/dispatch strategies and system-design attributes; and (4) historical information in major disaster prevention is incomplete. In this study, we propose a resilience analysis framework and a metric for measuring resilience that combines resilience capacities, disruption scenarios, and dispatch strategies. Non-homogeneous Hidden Markov Models (HMM) are designed to evaluate resilience capacities, including adaptive capacity, absorptive capacity, and recovery capacity under different disruption scenarios. Subsequently, an optimized dispatch strategy is proposed to maximize system resilience and ensure the continuity of system functionality. Finally, a case study of a water supply system taken from Shanghai City demonstrates that the proposed approaches are effective for system-resilience assessment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available