4.4 Article

Investigation into the risk of ultra-low tar cigarettes and lung cancer

Journal

REGULATORY TOXICOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY
Volume 89, Issue -, Pages 112-117

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2017.07.023

Keywords

Cigarettes; Tar yield; Lung cancer; Case-control study

Funding

  1. P N Lee Statistics and Computing Ltd
  2. Philip Morris International

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present analyses relating cigarette type to lung cancer based on a case-control study in five European countries. The analyses involved 3561 cases and 2301 controls with diseases not associated with smoking. Subjects completed a detailed questionnaire, including a lifetime smoking history. Analyses included never smokers, and those who smoked for at least 80% of the critical period from 2 to 20 years before diagnosis, ignoring those who ever smoked pipes or cigars, or chewed tobacco. The main analysis compares risk in those who, in the critical period, smoked ultra-low tar (ULT) cigarettes (machine yield <= 3 mg tar/cigarette) for 8 + years, with those who only smoked full flavour (FF) cigarettes (>= 10 mg tar/cigarette). After adjustment for sex, age, country, education, age of starting smoking, mean cigarette consumption and mean tar level 21-50 years before interview, the odds ratio (OR) was 0.73 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.50-1.06). Other analyses showed a modest, not statistically significant, reduction in risk with tar reduction. Risk in ULT smokers for 8 + years was substantially higher than in never smokers (OR 16.27, 95% CI 10.14-26.09). The study was prematurely terminated due to cost overrun, limiting the power to detect an association. More evidence is needed, particularly on lifetime ULT smoking. (C) 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available