4.4 Article

Do advisors perceive climate change as an agricultural risk? An in-depth examination of Midwestern US Ag advisors' views on drought, climate change, and risk management

Journal

AGRICULTURE AND HUMAN VALUES
Volume 35, Issue 2, Pages 349-365

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10460-017-9827-3

Keywords

Adaptation; Health belief model; Protection motivation theory; Drought; Qualitative

Funding

  1. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Sectoral Applications Research Program (SARP) [NA13OAR431012]
  2. USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture, Agriculture and Food Research Initiative Competitive Grant [2011-68002-30220]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Through the lens of the Health Belief Model and Protection Motivation Theory, we analyzed interviews of 36 agricultural advisors in Indiana and Nebraska to understand their appraisals of climate change risk, related decision making processes and subsequent risk management advice to producers. Most advisors interviewed accept that weather events are a risk for US Midwestern agriculture; however, they are more concerned about tangible threats such as crop prices. There is not much concern about climate change among agricultural advisors. Management practices that could help producers adapt to climate change were more likely to be recommended by conservation and Extension advisors, while financial and crop advisors focused more upon season-to-season decision making (e.g., hybrid seeds and crop insurance). We contend that the agricultural community should integrate long-term thinking as part of farm decision making processes and that agricultural advisors are in a prime position to influence producers. In the face of increasing extreme weather events, climatologists and advisors should work more closely to reach a shared understanding of the risks posed to agriculture by climate change.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available