4.3 Article

Biologically important hydrazide-containing fused azaisocytosines as antioxidant agents

Journal

REDOX REPORT
Volume 22, Issue 6, Pages 572-581

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/13510002.2017.1364330

Keywords

DPPH scavenging activity; NO scavenging effect; H2O2 scavenging ability; Fe3+ reducing power; hydrazide-containing fused azaisocytosines; antioxidant agents; UV characterisation

Funding

  1. Medical University of Lublin, Poland [DS 213]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: Two important classes of hydrazide-containing fused azaisocytosines were evaluated as possible antioxidants and characterised by UV spectroscopy. Methods: 2,2-Diphenyl-1-picrylhydazyl (DPPH), nitric oxide (NO), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) scavenging potencies and reducing power of molecules were evaluated. Results: The strongest DPPH scavengers were found to be 9, showing the potency superior to that of butylated hydroxyanisole (BHA), butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT), propyl gallate (PG) and 6-hydroxy-2,5,7,8-tetramethylchroman-2-carboxylic acid (Trolox) and comparable to that of ascorbic acid (AA), and 6, revealing the antioxidant potency superior to that of BHA, BHT, PG and Trolox. In turn, 3 and 9 were the most promising NO scavengers, exhibiting the potency superior to that of BHA, BHT (3 and 9) and AA (3). The most potent H2O2 scavengers proved to be 10 and 9 showing similar or even better neutralising potency than that of Trolox, BHT and BHA. Simultaneously, the majority of hydrazides revealed higher ferric reducing abilities than that of AA and BHT. Some structure-activity relationships were explored. A possible mechanism for the DPPH radical scavenging ability of hydrazide-containing molecules was proposed. Discussion: Hydrazides 3, 6 and 9 with an antioxidant potential better or comparable to that of the well-known antioxidants are proposed as new antioxidant candidates.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available