4.2 Review

Facilitating the Collaborative Interface between Child Protection and Specialist Domestic Violence Services: A Scoping Review

Journal

AUSTRALIAN SOCIAL WORK
Volume 71, Issue 2, Pages 148-161

Publisher

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/0312407X.2017.1415365

Keywords

Interagency Collaboration; Child Protection; Domestic Violence; Scoping Review; Family Law

Categories

Funding

  1. Australia's National Research Organisation for Women's Safety (ANROWS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Service provision in domestic and family violence involves complex responses from multiple systems. Early evidence involving other sectors suggests interagency working may benefit service systems and providers. This points to possible benefits for service users. A scoping review of models of interagency working between child protection and either domestic violence services or family law services, or all three services, was undertaken to improve understanding of practices that may facilitate collaboration between child protection and other agencies. A systematic search of nine databases and 10 organisation websites was conducted. Results were screened against selection criteria and 24 models were identified. From those, 22 facilitators for collaboration emerged and were grouped according to five interagency collaboration enablers: shared vision; formalisation of the model; authorising environment; leadership; and information sharing. These facilitators and enablers can be used to guide policy and practice development toward more integrated services for families experiencing domestic and family violence.IMPLICATIONSInteragency collaboration in response to domestic violence has the potential to improve service efficiencies which may increase safety and wellbeing for women and children.Effectiveness of enablers for improving service provision and wellbeing of women and children requires further investigation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available