4.5 Article

Efficient design optimization of variable-density cellular structures for additive manufacturing: theory and experimental validation

Journal

RAPID PROTOTYPING JOURNAL
Volume 23, Issue 4, Pages 660-677

Publisher

EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1108/RPJ-04-2016-0069

Keywords

Additive manufacturing; Reconstruction; Homogenization; Topology optimization; Cellular structure

Funding

  1. US Department of Energy's National Nuclear Security Administration [DE-AC04-94AL85000]
  2. American Makes (National Additive Manufacturing Innovation Institute)
  3. Air Force Research Laboratory [FA8650-12-2-7230]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose - The purpose of the paper is to propose a homogenization-based topology optimization method to optimize the design of variable-density cellular structure, in order to achieve lightweight design and overcome some of the manufacturability issues in additive manufacturing. Design/methodology/approach - First, homogenization is performed to capture the effective mechanical properties of cellular structures through the scaling law as a function their relative density. Second, the scaling law is used directly in the topology optimization algorithm to compute the optimal density distribution for the part being optimized. Third, a new technique is presented to reconstruct the computer-aided design (CAD) model of the optimal variable-density cellular structure. The proposed method is validated by comparing the results obtained through homogenized model, full-scale simulation and experimentally testing the optimized parts after being additive manufactured. Findings - The test examples demonstrate that the homogenization-based method is efficient, accurate and is able to produce manufacturable designs. Originality/value - The optimized designs in our examples also show significant increase in stiffness and strength when compared to the original designs with identical overall weight.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available