4.2 Article

Cross-Correlation of Heart Rate and Oxygen Saturation in Very Low Birthweight Infants: Association with Apnea and Adverse Events

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY
Volume 35, Issue 5, Pages 463-469

Publisher

THIEME MEDICAL PUBL INC
DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1608709

Keywords

sepsis; necrotizing enterocolitis; apnea; biomarker; periodic breathing; vital signs; entrainment; cross correlation

Funding

  1. NICHD NIH HHS [RC2 HD064488, R01 HD072071] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Analysis of subtle vital sign changes could facilitate earlier treatment of acute inflammatory illnesses. We previously showed that high cross-correlation of heart rate and oxygen saturation (XCorr-HR-SpO (2) ) occurs in some very low birthweight (VLBW) infants with sepsis, and hypothesized that this corresponds to apnea. Methods In 629 VLBW infants, we analyzed XCorr-HR-SpO (2) in relation to central apnea with bradycardia and desaturation (ABD), BD with or without central apnea (BD), and percent time in periodic breathing (PB) throughout the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) stay (75 infant-years). We reviewed 100 days with extremely high XCorr-HR-SpO (2) (>0.7) and control days for clinical associations. Next, we identified all cases of late-onset septicemia (LOS) and necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) and analyzed change in XCorr-HR-SpO (2) before diagnosis. Results Mean XCorr-HR-SpO (2) was approximate to 0.10, and increasing XCorr-HR-SpO (2) was associated with increasing ABD, BD, and PB (correlation coefficients >0.93). Days with maximum XCorr-HR-SpO (2) >0.7 were more likely to have an adverse event than control days (49% versus 13%). In 93 cases of LOS or NEC, there was a 67% increase in XCorr-HR-SpO (2) in the 24-hour period prior to diagnosis compared with the previous day ( p <0.01). Conclusion High XCorr-HR-SpO (2) is associated with apnea and adverse events including LOS and NEC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available