4.7 Article

VMAT plus a few computer-optimized non-coplanar IMRT beams (VMAT plus ) tested for liver SBRT

Journal

RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY
Volume 123, Issue 1, Pages 49-56

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2017.02.018

Keywords

VMAT; IMRT; Non-coplanar; Beam angle optimization; Automated planning; Liver SBRT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: To propose a novel treatment approach, designated VMAT+, involving addition of <5 IMRT beams with computer-optimized non-coplanar orientations to VMAT, and evaluate it for liver Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT). VMAT+ is investigated as an alternative for (1) coplanar VMAT and (2) multi-beam non-coplanar treatment. Methods/materials: For fifteen patients with liver metastases, VMAT+ plans were compared with (1) dual-arc VMAT and (2) 25-beam, non-coplanar treatment with computer-optimized beam orientations (25-NCP). All plans were generated fully automatically for delivery of the highest feasible tumor Biologically Effective Dose (BED). OAR doses, intermediate-dose-spillage, dose-compactness, and measured delivery times were evaluated. Results: With VMAT+ the maximum achievable tumor BED was equal to that of 25-NCP. Conversely, VMAT resulted in a lower tumor BED in 5 patients. Compared to VMAT, VMATt yielded significant dose reductions in OARs. Intermediate-dose-spillage and dose-compactness were significantly improved by 9.8% and 17.3% (p <= 0.002), respectively. Treatment times with VMAT+ were only enhanced by 4.1 min on average, compared to VMAT (8.4 min). Improvements in OAR sparing with 25-NCP, compared to VMAT+, were generally modest and/or statistically insignificant, while delivery times were on average 20.5 min longer. Conclusions: For liver SBRT, VMAT+ is equivalent to time-consuming treatment with 25 non-coplanar beams in terms of achievable tumor BED. Compared to VMAT, OAR sparing and intermediate-dose spillage are significantly improved, with minor increase in delivery time. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available