4.7 Article

Head and neck target delineation using a novel PET automatic segmentation algorithm

Journal

RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY
Volume 122, Issue 2, Pages 242-247

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2016.12.008

Keywords

Positron Emission Tomography; Image Segmentation; Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy; Automatic PET segmentation

Funding

  1. Cancer Research Wales [7061, 2476]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: To evaluate the feasibility and impact of using a novel advanced PET auto-segmentation method in Head and Neck (H&N) radiotherapy treatment (RT) planning. Methods: ATLAAS, Automatic decision Tree-based Learning Algorithm for Advanced Segmentation, previously developed and validated on pre-clinical data, was applied to F-18-FDG-PET/CT scans of 20 H&N patients undergoing Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy. Primary Gross Tumour Volumes (GTVs) manually delineated on CT/MRI scans (GTVp(CT/MRI)), together with ATLAAS-generated contours (GTVp(ATLAAs)) were used to derive the RT planning GTV (GTVp(final)), ATLAAS outlines were compared to CT/MRI and final GTVs qualitatively and quantitatively using a conformity metric. Results: The ATLAAS contours were found to be reliable and useful. The volume of GTVp(ATLAAS), was smaller than GTVp(CT/MRI) in 70% of the cases, with an average conformity index of 0.70. The information provided by ATLAAS was used to grow the GTVp(CT/MRI), in 10 cases (up to 10.6 mL) and to shrink the GTVp(CT/MRI) in 7 cases (up to 12.3 mL). ATLAAS provided complementary information to CT/MRI and GTVpATLAAs contributed to up to 33% of the final GTV volume across the patient cohort. Conclusions: ATLAAS can deliver operator independent PET segmentation to augment clinical outlining using CT and MRI and could have utility in future clinical studies. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Radiotherapy and Oncology 122 (2017) 242-247

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available