4.7 Article

Dose to heart substructures is associated with non-cancer death after SBRT in stage I-II NSCLC patients

Journal

RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY
Volume 123, Issue 3, Pages 370-375

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2017.04.017

Keywords

SBRT; Heart toxicity; Lung cancer

Funding

  1. Dutch Cancer Society [NKI 2009-4568]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background and purpose: To investigate potential associations between dose to heart (sub)structures and non-cancer death, in early stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). Methods: 803 patients with early stage NSCLC received SBRT with predominant schedules of 3 x 18 Gy (59%) or 4 x 12 Gy (19%). All patients were registered to an average anatomy, their planned dose deformed accordingly, and dosimetric parameters for heart substructures were obtained. Multivariate Cox regression and a sensitivity analysis were used to identify doses to heart substructures or heart region with a significant association with non-cancer death respectively. Results: Median follow-up was 34.8 months. Two year Kaplan-Meier overall survival rate was 67%. Of the deceased patients, 26.8% died of cancer. Multivariate analysis showed that the maximum dose on the left atrium (median 6.5 Gy EQD2, range = 0.009-197, HR = 1.005, p-value = 0.035), and the dose to 90% of the superior vena cava (median 0.59 Gy EQD2, range = 0.003-70, HR = 1.025, p-value = 0.008) were significantly associated with non-cancer death. Sensitivity analysis identified the upper region of the heart (atria + vessels) to be significantly associated with non-cancer death. Conclusions: Doses to mainly the upper region of the heart were significantly associated with non-cancer death. Consequently, dose sparing in particular of the upper region of the heart could potentially improve outcome, and should be further studied. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available