4.6 Article

Distinguishing benign from malignant thyroid nodules using thyroid ultrasonography: utility of adding superb microvascular imaging and elastography

Journal

RADIOLOGIA MEDICA
Volume 123, Issue 4, Pages 260-270

Publisher

SPRINGER-VERLAG ITALIA SRL
DOI: 10.1007/s11547-017-0839-2

Keywords

Elastography; Superb microvascular imaging; Thyroid nodule; Ultrasonography

Funding

  1. Toshiba Medical Systems

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Thyroid nodules are common; however, malignancy is less than 7%. Therefore, additional techniques such as Doppler ultrasonography or elastography are used to improve diagnostic performance of conventional ultrasonography. We want to prospectively investigate the use of additional superb microvascular imaging (SMI) and strain elastography to B-mode ultrasound in thyroid nodules in distinguishing benign from malignant thyroid nodules. We analyzed 52 thyroid nodules (malignant = 26, benign = 26) and reviewers scored the likelihood of malignancy for three data sets (i.e., B-mode ultrasonography alone, B-mode ultrasonography + SMI, and B-mode ultrasonography + strain elastography). The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (Az) values, sensitivities, and specificities were compared. A comparison of the data sets revealed that area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve values were similar without statistical difference. However, on comparing sensitivity and specificity based on the management decision of whether to conduct fine-needle aspiration (FNA) after combining information from all three types of imaging (B-mode ultrasonography + SMI + strain elastography), specificity was significantly higher for the combined technique (34.6%) than for B-mode ultrasonography alone (11.5%), without decrease in sensitivity (P = 0.032). Additional use of SMI and strain elastography could potentially lead to increase in specificity in thyroid ultrasonography.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available