4.7 Article

Using multivariate statistics to assess ecotourism potential of water-bodies: A case-study in Mauritania

Journal

TOURISM MANAGEMENT
Volume 67, Issue -, Pages 34-46

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.tourman.2018.01.001

Keywords

Tourism planning; Deserts; Multi-criteria approach; Ordination methods; Clustering algorithms; Low-income countries; Wetlands

Funding

  1. Rufford through a Small Grant for Nature Conservation [17893-1]
  2. Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia [PD/BD/132407/2017, PD/BD/128492/2017, SFRH/BD/87885/2012, IF/00459/2013]
  3. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [PD/BD/132407/2017, SFRH/BD/87885/2012, PD/BD/128492/2017] Funding Source: FCT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Evaluating the ecotourism potential of sites is a key issue in tourism management. Multiple methodologies have been developed to assess the ecotourism potential of sites. However, there are many constraints affecting their quality. Methodologies independent of subjective criteria and weights are lacking, compromising following interpretations on where to allocate efforts for ecotourism development. We propose a new approach to circumvent these issues that combines independent statistical procedures to assess ecotourism potential. By combining multi-criteria with ordination and clustering algorithms, this two-stage statistical approach allowed identifying suitable water-bodies for ecotourism development in Mauritania and independently assessed which features are related with ecotourism potential. The method was able to group sites for different ecotourist demands, which has implications for policy makers and tourism planners trying to optimize investments while protecting biodiversity and supporting communities. We provide a framework that is scalable and applicable by stakeholders operating in ecotourism planning and management worldwide. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available