4.7 Article

Dynamic TOPMODEL: A new implementation in R and its sensitivity to time and space steps

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE
Volume 72, Issue -, Pages 155-172

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2015.06.010

Keywords

Dynamic TOPMODEL; R; Gwy; Plynlimon; Distributed hydrological model

Funding

  1. JBA Trust [W12-1866]
  2. Centre for Global Eco-innovation (CGE) [132]
  3. NERC [NE/L010399/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/L010399/1, ceh010010] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In 2001, Beven and Freer introduced a dynamic variant of TOPMODEL that addressed some of the limitations of the original model whilst retaining its computational and parametric efficiency. The original assumption of a quasi-steady water table was replaced by time-dependent kinematic routing within hydrological similar areas. The new formulation allows a more flexible discretisation, variable upslope drainage areas and spatially variable physical properties. There has, however, never been a freely distributable version of dynamic TOPMODEL. Here, we describe a new, open source, version developed in the R environment. It incorporates handling of geo-referenced spatial data that allows it to integrate with modern GIS. It makes use of data storage and vectorisation features of the language that will allow efficient scaling of the problem domain. The implementation is evaluated with data from a small catchment. The formulation of the model in terms of a flow distribution matrix is described and its use illustrated for treatment of surface and subsurface flow routing. The model uses an improved implicit solution for updating the subsurface storages and fluxes. The paper focuses on the robustness of the predicted output variables to changes in the time and space discretisations. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available