4.5 Article

Can a single model account for both risky choices and inter-temporal choices? Testing the assumptions underlying models of risky inter-temporal choice

Journal

PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW
Volume 25, Issue 2, Pages 785-792

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.3758/s13423-017-1330-8

Keywords

Risky choice; Inter-temporal choice; Utility

Funding

  1. Australian Research Council Future Fellowship [FT110100151]
  2. ARC Discovery Project [DP 140101145]
  3. Australian Research Council DECRA Fellowship [DE130100129]
  4. UNSW PhD Scholarship

Ask authors/readers for more resources

There is growing interest in modelling how people make choices that involve both risks and delays, i.e., risky inter-temporal choices. We investigated an untested assumption underlying several proposed risky inter-temporal choice models: that pure risky choices and pure inter-temporal choices are special cases of risky inter-temporal choice. We tested this assumption by presenting a single group of participants with risky choices and inter-temporal choices. We then compared the performance of a model that is fit to both choice types simultaneously, with the performance of separate models fit to the risky choice and inter-temporal choice data. We find, using Bayesian model comparison, that the majority of participants are best fit by a single model that incorporates both risky and inter-temporal choices. This result supports the assumption that risky choices and inter-temporal choices may be special cases of risky inter-temporal choice. Our results also suggest that, under the conditions of our experiment, interpretation of monetary value is very similar in risky choices and inter-temporal choices.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available