4.4 Article

New Insights Towards Developing Recommender Systems

Journal

COMPUTER JOURNAL
Volume 61, Issue 3, Pages 319-348

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/comjnl/bxx056

Keywords

taxonomy; systematic review; computational intelligence; recommendation techniques; similarity computation algorithms; evaluation; recommender system; market strategy

Funding

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada through Vanier Canada Graduate Scholarships
  2. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada through Discovery Research Grant
  3. Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst (DAAD) through Bi-nationally Supervised Doctoral Degrees Scholarship, Germany

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Promoting recommender systems in real-world applications requires deep investigations with emphasis on their next generation. This survey offers a comprehensive and systematic review on recommender system development lifecycles to enlighten researchers and practitioners. The paper conducts statistical research on published recommender systems indexed by Web of Science to get an overview of the state of the art. Based on the reviewed findings, we introduce taxonomies driven by the following five phases: initiation (architecture and data acquisition techniques), design (design types and techniques), development (implementation methods and algorithms), evaluation (metrics and measurement techniques) and application (domains of applications). A layered framework of recommender systems containing market strategy, data, recommender core, interaction, security and evaluation is proposed. Based on the framework, the existing advanced humanized techniques emerged from computational intelligence and some inspiring insights from computational economics and machine learning are provided for researchers to expand the novel aspects of recommender systems.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available