4.5 Article

Elevated peripheral blood glutamate levels in major depressive disorder

Journal

NEUROPSYCHIATRIC DISEASE AND TREATMENT
Volume 14, Issue -, Pages 945-953

Publisher

DOVE MEDICAL PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.2147/NDT.S159855

Keywords

glutamate; major depressive disorder; blood; association study; meta-analysis

Funding

  1. Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development, AMED [15K09809, 16K19769]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [15K09809, 16K19769] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: There is growing evidence that glutamatergic signaling may be involved in major depressive disorder (MDD). In regard to peripheral blood glutamate changes in MDD, inconsistent findings have been reported. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate whether blood glutamate levels differed between MDD patients and control participants. Materials and methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of 12 association studies between blood glutamate levels and MDD in a total of 529 MDD patients and 590 controls. Subsequently, we conducted subgroup analyses and a meta-regression analysis to examine the sources of potential heterogeneity. Results: A random effects model showed that blood glutamate levels were significantly higher in MDD patients than in controls (standardized mean difference=0.54, 95% CI=0.27-0.82, p=8.5x10(-5)) with high heterogeneity (I-2=75.0%, p<0.05). Subgroup analyses showed elevated glutamate levels in MDD patients compared with controls in plasma, but not serum studies, and in studies using high-performance liquid chromatography but not with mass spectrometry for glutamate assay. A meta-regression analysis showed no effects of age, gender, medication use, sample size, and published year on blood glutamate levels. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that altered glutamate levels may be implicated in MDD, which provides further evidence of glutamatergic dysfunction in MDD.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available