Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.Interpreting Change in Scores on Patient-Reported Outcome Instruments
Cheryl D. Coon et al.
THERAPEUTIC INNOVATION & REGULATORY SCIENCE (2016)
Interpreting change from patient reported outcome (PRO) endpoints: patient global ratings of concept versus patient global ratings of change, a case study among osteoporosis patients
Annabel Nixon et al.
HEALTH AND QUALITY OF LIFE OUTCOMES (2016)
Don't middle your MIDs: regression to the mean shrinks estimates of minimally important differences
Peter M. Fayers et al.
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH (2014)
Methods for interpreting change over time in patient-reported outcome measures
K. W. Wyrwich et al.
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH (2013)
Determining the non-inferiority margin for patient reported outcomes
Christoph Gerlinger et al.
PHARMACEUTICAL STATISTICS (2011)
Responder Analyses-A PhRMA Position Paper
Tom Uryniak et al.
STATISTICS IN BIOPHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH (2011)
Defining a minimal clinically important difference for endometriosis-associated pelvic pain measured on a visual analog scale: analyses of two placebo-controlled, randomized trials
Christoph Gerlinger et al.
HEALTH AND QUALITY OF LIFE OUTCOMES (2010)
Recommended methods for determining responsiveness and minimally important differences for patient-reported outcomes
Dennis Revicki et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2008)
Estimating clinically significant differences in quality of life outcomes
KW Wyrwich et al.
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH (2005)
Share Paper
