4.5 Article

Health-related quality of life of a very special population: monks of Holy Mountain Athos, Greece

Journal

QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH
Volume 26, Issue 11, Pages 3169-3175

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11136-017-1622-5

Keywords

Monks; Holy Mount Athos; Greece; Health-related quality of life

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The investigation of Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) of Orthodox Christian monks who live at the Holy Mount Athos in Greece, and its correlation with demographic characteristics and Sense of Coherence (SOC-13). A cross-sectional study was designed. The seven monasteries and five scetes with the largest number of monk population were invited to participate. Two monasteries and 1 scete gave their permission for the study. The final monks sample was formed by 166 monks from 215 who participated to the study. HRQOL was assessed using the SF-12 and Sense of Coherence the SOC-13 scales that were completed by monks from May to August 2012. Ieultiple linear regression analyses were conducted to explore the association of the HRQOL subscales with the demographics and SOC-13. The mean age was 45.5 +/- 13.0 years; 83.7% lived in communal monasteries, and the mean number of years in monasticism was 18.4 +/- 12.1. The mean value of their Physical Component Summary (PCS) score was 47.3 +/- 5.3, which is lower than in the general Greek men population, while their Mental Component Summary (MCS) score was 56.4 +/- 5.8, which is higher than in the general Greek men population. The mean value of SOC-13 was 65.7 +/- 6.5. Positive association for PCS appeared for place of living (beta = 5.43, SE = 1.27, p < 0.001) and negative association for age (beta = -0.16, SE = 0.03, p < 0.001) while for MCS for number of years in monasticism (beta = 0.07, SE = 0.06, p = 0.023) and sense of coherence (beta = 0.47, SE = 0.06, p < 0.001). The results indicated that monks had better mental health but worse physical health compared to the general Greek male population. More studies are required to validate the above findings.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available