Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.Handling Do-Not-Know Answers: Exploring New Approaches in Online and Mixed-Mode Surveys
Edith D. de Leeuw et al.
SOCIAL SCIENCE COMPUTER REVIEW (2016)
A Web Experiment Showing Negative Effects of Slider Scales Compared to Visual Analogue Scales and Radio Button Scales
Frederik Funke
SOCIAL SCIENCE COMPUTER REVIEW (2016)
An experiment testing six formats of 101-point rating scales
Mingnan Liu et al.
COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR (2016)
MEASURING GENERALIZED TRUST AN EXAMINATION OF QUESTION WORDING AND THE NUMBER OF SCALE POINTS
Sebastian Lundmark et al.
PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY (2016)
Correction for Measurement Errors in Survey Research: Necessary and Possible
Willem E. Saris et al.
SOCIAL INDICATORS RESEARCH (2016)
Rating Scales in Accounting Research: The Impact of Scale Points and Labels
Jared Eutsler et al.
BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH IN ACCOUNTING (2015)
Effect of using different labels for the scales in a web survey
Melanie Revilla
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MARKET RESEARCH (2015)
Are Sliders Too Slick for Surveys? An Experiment Comparing Slider and Radio Button Scales for Smartphone, Tablet and Computer Based Surveys
Trent D. Buskirk et al.
METHODS DATA ANALYSES (2015)
Reliability and Validity of an Adapted Version of the Cantril Ladder for Use with Adolescent Samples
K. A. Levin et al.
SOCIAL INDICATORS RESEARCH (2014)
Middle Alternatives Revisited: How the neither/nor Response Acts as a Way of Saying I Don't Know?
Patrick Sturgis et al.
SOCIOLOGICAL METHODS & RESEARCH (2014)
Choosing the Number of Categories in Agree-Disagree Scales
Melanie A. Revilla et al.
SOCIOLOGICAL METHODS & RESEARCH (2014)
How Do Respondents Attend to Verbal Labels in Rating Scales?
Natalja Menold et al.
FIELD METHODS (2014)
Asking Good Survey Questions
Sara Dolnicar
JOURNAL OF TRAVEL RESEARCH (2013)
Why Semantic Differentials in Web-Based Research Should Be Made from Visual Analogue Scales and Not from 5-Point Scales
Frederik Funke et al.
FIELD METHODS (2012)
Studies Comparing Numerical Rating Scales, Verbal Rating Scales, and Visual Analogue Scales for Assessment of Pain Intensity in Adults: A Systematic Literature Review
Marianne Jensen Hjermstad et al.
JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT (2011)
Sliders for the Smart: Type of Rating Scale on the Web Interacts With Educational Level
Frederik Funke et al.
SOCIAL SCIENCE COMPUTER REVIEW (2011)
The effect of rating scale format on response styles: The number of response categories and response category labels
Bert Weijters et al.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN MARKETING (2010)
Positive First or Negative First? Effects of the Order of Answering Categories on Response Behavior
Dagmar Krebs et al.
METHODOLOGY-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RESEARCH METHODS FOR THE BEHAVIORAL AND SOCIAL SCIENCES (2010)
Optimal Design of Branching Questions to Measure Bipolar Constructs
Neil Malhotra et al.
PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY (2009)
Middle category endorsement in odd-numbered Likert response scales: Associated item characteristics, cognitive demands, and preferred meanings
John T. Kulas et al.
JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN PERSONALITY (2009)
Designing Scalar Questions for Web Surveys
Leah Melani Christian et al.
SOCIOLOGICAL METHODS & RESEARCH (2009)
Interval-level measurement with visual analogue scales in Internet-based research: VAS Generator
Ulf-Dietrich Reips et al.
BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS (2008)
Color, labels, and interpretive heuristics for response scales
Roger Tourangeau et al.
PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY (2007)
Helping respondents get it right the first time: The influence of words, symbols, and graphics in web surveys
Leah Melani Christian et al.
PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY (2007)
Does response scale format affect the answering of personality scales? Assessing the big five dimensions of personality with different response scales in a dependent sample
Beatrice Rammstedt et al.
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT (2007)
Evaluating the effectiveness of visual analog scales - A web experiment
MP Couper et al.
SOCIAL SCIENCE COMPUTER REVIEW (2006)
What they see is what we get - Response options for web surveys
MP Couper et al.
SOCIAL SCIENCE COMPUTER REVIEW (2004)
Spacing, position, and order - Interpretive heuristics for visual features of survey questions
R Tourangeau et al.
PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY (2004)
Score reliability in Web- or Internet-based surveys: Unnumbered graphic rating scales versus likert-type scales
C Cook et al.
EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT (2001)
Web survey design and administration
MP Couper et al.
PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY (2001)
Modeling Acquiescence in Measurement Models for Two Balanced Sets of Items
Jaak B. Billiet et al.
STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL (2000)
Optimal number of response categories in rating scales: reliability, validity, discriminating power, and respondent preferences
CC Preston et al.
ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA (2000)
Share Paper
