4.5 Review

The comparative efficacy and safety of sugammadex and neostigmine in reversing neuromuscular blockade in adults. A Cochrane systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis

Journal

ANAESTHESIA
Volume 73, Issue 5, Pages 631-641

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/anae.14160

Keywords

adverse events; neostigmine; recovery time; sugammadex; systematic review

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We compared the efficacy and safety of sugammadex and neostigmine in reversing neuromuscular blockade in adults. Our outcomes were: recovery time from second twitch to train-of-four ratio >0.9; recovery time from post-tetanic count 1-5 to train-of-four ratio >0.9; and risk of composite adverse and serious adverse events. We searched for randomised clinical trials irrespective of publication status and date, blinding status, outcomes reported or language. We included 41 studies with 4206 participants. Time to reversal of neuromuscular blockade from second twitch to a train-of-four ratio >0.9 was 2.0min with sugammadex 2mg.kg(-1) and 12.9min with neostigmine 0.05mg.kg(-1), with a mean difference (MD) (95%CI)) of 10.2 (8.5-12.0) (I-2=84%, 10 studies, n=835, Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE): moderate quality). Time to reversal of neuromuscular blockade from a post-tetanic count of 1-5 to a train-of-four ratio >0.9 was 2.9min with sugammadex 4mg.kg(-1) and 48.8min with neostigmine 0.07mg.kg(-1), with a MD (95%CI) of 45.8 (39.4-52.2) (I-2=0%, 2 studies, n=114, GRADE: low quality). There were significantly fewer composite adverse events in the sugammadex group compared with neostigmine, with a risk ratio (95%CI) of 0.60 (0.49-0.74) (I-2=40%, 28 studies, n=2298, number needed to treat (NNT): 8, GRADE: moderate quality). Specifically, the risk of bradycardia (RR (95%CI) 0.16 (0.07-0.34), n=1218, NNT: 14, GRADE: moderate quality), postoperative nausea and vomiting (RR (95%CI) 0.52 (0.28-0.97), n=389, NNT: 16, GRADE: low quality) and overall signs of postoperative residual paralysis (RR (95%CI) 0.40 (0.28-0.57), n=1474, NNT: 13, GRADE: moderate quality) were all reduced. There was no significant difference regarding the risk of serious adverse events (RR 0.54, 95%CI 0.13-2.25, I-2=0%, n=959, GRADE: low quality). Sugammadex reverses neuromuscular blockade more rapidly than neostigmine and is associated with fewer adverse events.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available