4.8 Article

Biophysical Assessment of Pulmonary Surfactant Predicts the Lung Toxicity of Nanomaterials

Journal

SMALL METHODS
Volume 2, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/smtd.201700367

Keywords

constrained drop surfactometry; lung collapse; nanotoxicology; pulmonary surfactant; surface tension

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [CBET-1604119]
  2. national 973 program [2014CB932000]
  3. Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDB14000000]
  4. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21425731, 21637004]
  5. Directorate For Engineering
  6. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys [1604119] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

With the rapid development of nanotechnology and an increasing use of nanoenabled consumer products, there is an urgent need to develop precautionary tools to evaluate acute lung toxicity of engineered nanomaterials (ENMs). As natural pulmonary surfactant (PS) film represents the initial barrier of nano-bio interactions in the lungs, a novel in vitro experimental method, called constrained drop surfactometry (CDS), is developed to quantitatively evaluate PS inhibition caused by ENMs. The results show that at a very low concentration, four representative ENMs, including carbon nanotubes, graphene oxide, zinc oxide, and silver nanoparticles, all increase in vitro minimum surface tension of a modified natural PS, Infasurf. These in vitro results are related to the extensive alveolar collapse and inflammation observed in vivo in mice exposed to these ENMs in an intratracheal instillation model. Thus, there may be a direct correlation between in vitro surface tension increase due to PS inhibition by ENMs and in vivo lung toxicity revealed by alveolar collapse and inflammation. Compared to commonly used animal models, CDS holds great promise for the development of an animal-free, easy-to-use, and low-cost precautionary assay for the prediction of acute lung toxicity of inhaled ENMs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available