4.3 Article

Trends in dietary fat and fatty acid intakes and related food sources among Chinese adults: a longitudinal study from the China Health and Nutrition Survey (1997-2011)

Journal

PUBLIC HEALTH NUTRITION
Volume 20, Issue 16, Pages 2927-2936

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S1368980017001781

Keywords

Trends; Fat; Fatty acid; Food sources

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [R01-HD30880, DK056350, R01-HD38700]
  2. Fogarty International Center, NIH

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: Few studies have evaluated the intake trends of fatty acids in China. The present study aimed to describe the profile of longitudinal dietary fat and fatty acid intakes and their related food sources in Chinese adults. Design: A longitudinal study using data from the China Health and Nutrition Survey (1997-2011) was conducted. Dietary intake was estimated using 24 h recalls combined with a food inventory for three consecutive days. Linear mixed models were used to calculate the adjusted mean intake values. Setting: Urban and rural communities in nine provinces (autonomous regions), China. Subjects: Adults (n 19 475; 9420 men and 10 055 women). Results: Fat intake among men in 1997 was 73.4 g/d (28.1 % of total energy (%TE)), while in 2011 it increased to 86.3 g/d (33.2 %TE). Similarly, for women, this intake increased from 62.7 g/d (28.4 %TE) in 1997 to 74.1 g/d (33.7 %TE) in 2011. Energy intake from SFA grew from 6.8 to 7.6 %TE for both sexes. PUFA intake increased from 18.4 to 22.5 g/d for men and from 15.7 to 19.7 g/d for women, and was above 6 %TE in all survey periods. Intakes of 18:2 and 18:3 fatty acids showed significant upward trends in both sexes. Participants consumed less animal fats and more vegetable oils, with more PUFA intake and less energy from SFA. EPA and DHA intakes fluctuated around 20 mg/d. Conclusions: Fatty acid intakes and profile in Chinese adults are different from those reported in other countries.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available